Flowers Tumblr Themes
Goldaline, my dear.

19. philadelphia. temple university. religion and classics double major. writer. photographer. musician. body positive. sex positive. supporter of radical self-love. socialist. vegan. snake owner. in love. etc.


1/246 Next


fuckyeahcracker:

Demanding civil rights and just treatment for People of Color has always been about exposing the truth of racial disparities and demanding justice—  not about making sure white people’s feelings don’t hurt and white people don’t feel uncomfortable about the reality of racism.

You should feel uncomfortable about the actual racism enough to do something to fix it, not complain about how we tell you about it!

“If you aren’t willing to fight racism because people aren’t coddling you, YOU ARE THE PROBLEM.”


Tagged as: racism,


"You don’t owe prettiness to anyone. Not to your boyfriend/spouse/partner, not to your co-workers, especially not to random men on the street. You don’t owe it to your mother, you don’t owe it to your children, you don’t owe it to civilization in general. Prettiness is not a rent you pay for occupying a space marked “female”."

Erin McKean, You Don’t Have to be Pretty (via youuidiotkid)


theshirelock:

dramaddict:

one guacamole is equal to 6.0221415×10²³ guacas

Avocado’s number






"

For most of America, Psy is a funny name, a funny face, and a funny personality. He doesn’t sing in English and most people just don’t get it leaving most of them to not take him seriously. It’s easy to strip the significance behind “Gangnam Style” down if you don’t know what it means and solely find entertainment in the Asian guy shaking his hips. But what most people don’t realize is that Psy doesn’t take himself seriously. He’s a satirist and political dissident. “Gangnam Style” was a commentary, not just a fun pop tune with a silly dance.

Gangnam is Seoul’s wealthiest and flashiest neighborhood. For South Koreans, Gangnam represents the ideal life of excess and consumerism. Psy’s character in the video is a wannabe Gangnamite. He dreams he’s living the flashy, excessive lifestyle while he’s really just like everyone else, swimming in a public pool and riding the subway. But never in the video does it seem that Psy’s character is unhappy. He’s content to play in a children’s playground and meet the girl of his dreams in the subway. “Gangnam Style” is much more that we have made it, but that’s not surprising considering Psy’s background and how little we know about it.

In America, it seems like “Gangnam Style” was Psy’s big break when in fact the song had been released on his sixth studio album and his music career hadn’t been about making flashy and catchy songs. He believes music is the key to overcoming the intolerance embedded in his country’s political systems. Throughout his career, his songs have been banned for inappropriate content and have been surrounded by controversy, not to mention the fact that he fought his mandatory military draft.

Psy is a voice for his people. He’s fighting the oppression and intolerance he sees in his culture through his music. And by ignoring his worth and his value, we’re reducing the culture of South Korea into a short man with funny pants doing a ridiculous dance.

"

Opinion: American media chooses to undervalue artists like Psy from “Gangnam Style”  (via kpop-confessions)

THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS

(via nikinapalm)


fuckyeahbodypositivity:

Fat people do not have to be healthy in order to deserve dignity

Fat people do not have to be healthy in order to deserve dignity

Fat people do not have to be healthy in order to deserve dignity

If I see someone say, “It’s ok to be fat as long as you’re healthy,” one more time I’m gonna lose it. I know this is a crazy radical idea, but how about someone’s health has nothing to do with how you should treat them or how much respect they are deserving of?




pedazitosfightsback:

If you believe that AAVE is not cultural appropriation, you are going to want to stop reading this and respond to me multiple times throughout the post. Don’t. Read it all the way through.

________________________

89% of the time, this is the argument for why cultural appropriation is okay:

“Don’t you want to share your culture with other people?!”

Especially to people who lack a “culture,” the answer may come as a surprise to you: no. I do not want to share something that you do not understand, that you have no connection to whatsoever, that you commodify for these reasons—I don’t want to share my culture with you.

Particularly, AAVE.

AAVE is a language. This means it has its own grammatical structure, vocabulary, nuances and means of communication. It is a language that I speak and understand around family and black friends. It is, like all other languages, best understood if learned from birth than if adopted later in life.

It isn’t “cool” or “wrong” or “funny,” but a language that when spoken by me is as normal to my tongue as American English.

When people who are not first-language AAVE speakers use AAVE, it is often

  1. In jest (why do black people pronounce words wrong let me do it to imitate people I think are more stupid than me), or
  2. Used to look cool (I think using AAVE in my slam poetry for open mic night will make it so deep; I am a white anarchist but I use AAVE because I’m urban and inclusive; that’s so dope! sup bro! ratchet! ill! this shirt is bad!)

I know what you’re thinking: this is just a language and languages are adopted all the time. Here is why you are ignorant and wrong and what is happening is actually appropriation:

The most important feature of appropriation is the stealing of something from another culture and changing-meaning of, either by diluting the meaning or just changing the meaning in general, the cultural thing that has been stolen. Guess what non-AAVE speakers?

When you use AAVE: You don’t use the shit correctly.

When you insert random AAVE into your conversation, it is equivalent to taking a word randomly from one language and using it in an English sentence. In cases where translations are direct (objects), this is usually fine and doesn’t change the meaning at all. In cases where the translation is not direct, you are literally (follow the logic)

  • taking a word that your language does not have a meaning for and then
  • changing the meaning of that word to fit into the context of your language and life.

Especially with regard to AAVE stolen from popular black media, which is more available to non-AAVE speakers and is therefore more accessed and appropriated, non-AAVE speaking audiences will adopt the word and, using the only language context they know, will unknowingly change the meaning of the word just because it’s what makes sense to them.

The problem is that AAVE takes more than context clues. In AAVE, the way a thing is said can change the meaning of it. It is not a tonal language, but a lot of things in AAVE are implied, which is why many black people do what is considered rude and “interrupt” someone when they’re talking.

The truth is that we have learned from a very young age to anticipate meaning in a sentence and oftentimes, especially because AAVE is our first language, will naturally do this (even when the meaning we interpret is incorrect). It is also AAVE-speaking customary to interrupt someone while they are talking, because since we have already anticipated the ending of a sentence, it’s not necessary for them to finish it.

Because of the social standing of Blacks in the US, a lot of AAVE is taken and appropriated to mean something negative or pejorative even when it is not meant to be so.

Taking examples from popular media of AAVE being taken and appropriated, I will use the popular and commonly mistaken Ratchet Girl Anthem (video starts at 1:35). Before analyzing what the word ratchet really means vs. how AAVE-appropriators use it, I would like to point out how cultural appropriation of AAVE takes place in the first place:

  1. Person who is non-AAVE speaking hears this song
  2. Person hears the word “ratchet,” which is not currently a word/does not have meaning in their vocabulary
  3. Person concludes using context clues and inflection of the singers’ voices that “ratchet” indeed is something undesirable
  4. Because of social standing of Blacks and the various stereotypes of Black people in the club are played up in this song, the person assumes the word “ratchet” must relate to qualities of Black culture that society has deemed “undesirable”
  5. Person associates the word “ratchet” with all negative stereotypes of black people, even when that is not what the word is used for, because that is what makes sense to them in their lingo-social context

And if you are a non-AAVE speaker, think of how you’ve been using the word, “ratchet.” If someone is loud or boisterous, a quality associated with “negative aspects of Black culture,” you might call them ratchet. If you pass a black person up and they do something you deem “ghetto,” you might call them ratchet.

At this point, the word goes on to take a meaning that can be substituted for any negative thing or event you as a non-AAVE speaker encounter. Burn a cake? Ratchet. Clumsily trip over a backpack? Ratchet. Someone cuts you off? Ratchet.

But here’s the thing:

Ratchet simply means (and fellow Black brethren please help me translate this) to be poorly suited. To not be dressed your best. To look bad.

Seriously. Look at when they use it in the song:

OMG, what do she have on? (She ratchet)
Her lace front is all wrong. (She ratchet)
Boy bye, not with them shoes on (He ratchet) 

AAVE speakers pick up on this immediately, because we are able to discern what exactly they’re labeling as “ratchet.” Non-AAVE speakers will hear the whole song—the part where they glorify child support, and babydaddies getting out of prison, and getting new merchandise—and incorrectly assume these things (which are also stereotypically considered the be negative qualities of Black culture) are included in the ratchet part.

You have to remember, as a non-AAVE speaker, you may learn the occasional word, but there is a whole grammatical structure that you do not understand at all and it inhibits your comprehension of rap songs. It is easy to believe you understand it, but why do you think black people laugh when non-AAVE speakers cover rap songs, or use words they heard from rap songs?

When you cover a rap song, it is equivalent to a poor Spanish speaker covering a Spanish song; when you use words you hear from rap songs, you often use them incorrectly even without knowing.

The problem, though, is that 75% of this country is white, and most of those white people are using words they’ve adopted from AAVE. Incorrectly. When they change the meanings of these words, it’s appropriation.

Why that is more harmful than you think:

The case of ratchet, where a word that is used to describe someone’s attire is incorrectly attributed to negative aspects of the whole black race, is indicative of most cultural appropriation of AAVE. AAVE ends up being appropriated by non-AAVE speakers and then used against AAVE speakers, a group that is 99.9999% black. Words in AAVE that don’t mean anything negative will, when appropriated, become negative in meaning or negative in connotation simply because they are words that originated from black culture.

Most importantly It’s an unspoken rule that AAVE, when spoken by white people, is cute, not ignorant, and playful. When spoken by black people, it’s “ghetto.” AAVE spoken by a white person can cost them respectability or professionalism; AAVE when spoken by black people can cost them a job, opportunities, and even their own livelihood. If a you passed up a white person speaking AAVE, you’d think, “He’s playing around.” If you passed a black person speaking it, even if they were playing around, you’d think, “Why can’t they speak English correctly?”

Most importantly, it creates a false sense in oppressors that we are all laughing at the same thing. When black people laugh at AAVE, we are laughing at the language and how it is used. When non-AAVE speakers laugh at AAVE, you are laughing at blackness; you’re laughing at what you think is more ignorant and stupid than you.

Because you don’t understand.

Do you see why I would not want you to “share” that part of my culture? That isn’t sharing at all. That’s bastardizing.

If you are a non-AAVE speaker but constantly use the word “ratchet” you need to fucking STOP. And you need to stop making fun of (black) people that “don’t speak English correctly.” ^^This is why^^

You are appropriating a real language and diluting its meaning and turning it into a costume/something to laugh at. AND ITS NOT OKAY.






note-a-bear:

b-sama:

Africans are helping themselves more than aid workers are, according to new research.

Analysis of cash flows by Hong Kong-based Ghanaian academic Adams Bodomo shows that Africans living outside the continent send more money home to their families than is sent by traditional Western aid donors in what is called Official Development Assistance (ODA).

In 2010 - the most recent year for which meaningful comparisons can be made, according to Mr Bodomo - the African diaspora remitted $51.8bn (£34bn) to the continent.

In the same year, according to World Bank figures, ODA to Africa was $43bn (£28bn).

“I started the research to see if I could support a hunch I had that money remitted by African families was more efficient aid than ODA money,” the Ghanaian professor told the BBC.

“I found it was clearly more efficient and better targeted but to my surprise I found it was also a much bigger sum.”

*sips tea*


Tagged as: africa,


"

The report finds that between 2001 and 2010, there were over 8 million marijuana arrests in the United States, 88% of which were for possession. Marijuana arrests have increased between 2001 and 2010 and now account for over half [52%] of all drug arrests in the United States, and marijuana possession arrests account for nearly half [46%] of all drug arrests. In 2010, there was one marijuana arrest every 37 seconds, and states spent combined over $3.6 billion enforcing marijuana possession laws.

The report also finds that, on average, a black person is 3.73 times more likely to be arrested for marijuana possession than a white person, even though blacks and whites use marijuana at similar rates. Such racial disparities in marijuana possession arrests exist in all regions of the country, in counties large and small, urban and rural, wealthy and poor, with large and small black populations.

"

From the ACLU’s excellent new report The War on Marijuana in Black and White (via prettayprettaygood)




"Suppose a man makes unwanted social advances to a woman in, let’s say, a restaurant or theatre, and she eventually has to tell him loudly or angrily to get lost. She is the one who will be perceived as rude, hostile, aggressive, and obnoxious. His verbal aggression and invasiveness are accepted and expected; her rudeness (or mere curtness) in getting rid of him is noticed and condemned. One of our great myths is that a “real lady” can and should handle any difficulty, defuse any assault, without ever raising her voice or losing her manners. Female rudeness or violence in resistance to male aggression has often been taken to prove that the woman was not a lady in the first place, and therefore deserved no respect from the aggressor or sympathy from others."

D.A. Clarke, “A Woman With a Sword” (via ellielamothe)


Soooooo did anyone else notice that basically the only black people they cast in the new Arrested Development season are the servicemen that George & Lucille refuse to tip (who appear only briefly) and Herbert Love and his wife? And Love is like this hypersexual, misogynist politician who cheats on his wife with multiple women. And his wife cheats on him for revenge.

UHHHH, like what happened to debunking harmful stereotypes?

I feel like so many people will write it off too. “Oh, well it was just a play on Herman Cain!! So its okay!!”

So it was okay to not include any black people pretty much ever in the history of the show—with the exception of Carl Weathers—until they needed a misogynist douchebag politician and THEN they had to go with a play on Herman Cain?? Yeah, okay.

There are literally dozens of white politicians who have been caught in sex scandals/have been hit with sexual harassment charges that they could have chosen from.

I guess I shouldn’t be surprised, but really wow wtf.